On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Why I ask is because diskd is known to be somewhat slow on large cache
Not really large. 2x 1G. It's no storage bottleneck I believe.
large cache hits == hits on largeish cached objects.
hits in certain situations UNLESS there is sufficient traffic to keep
Squid reasonably buzy (i.e. problems if you are the only user, or very
few users). And the same for aufs in older versions of Squid.
See. Would fit.
A quick test if this is your problem is to reconfigure your Squid to use
the ufs cache_dir type.
Regards
Henrik
