I don't know the answer to your problem, but I can confirm that transparent mode and squid_redirect do work together, at least on Linux. Here's a snippet of my 2.5.STABLE12 squid.config: httpd_accel_port 80 httpd_accel_host virtual httpd_accel_with_proxy on httpd_accel_uses_host_header on redirect_program /etc/squid/adzapper/squid_redirect redirect_children 12 Does your squid_redirect have executable permission by Squid? Do you have any general problems with your Perl installation? On Saturday 26 November 2005 5:32 pm, Alexander Farber wrote: > I've tried replacing the AdZap's squid_redirect script by a simple > redirector from http://wiki.squid-cache.org/faq/redirectors and > have the same problem. So it isn't AdZap's fault. > > Is running Squid in transparent mode AND using redirect_programs > possible? > > On 11/26/05, Alexander Farber <alexander.farber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm running Squid 2.5.STABLE12 on OpenBSD -current (i.e. post 3.8) in > > transparent mode as described at http://www.benzedrine.cx/transquid.html > > > > It works fine - both as transparent proxy and also if I enter the IP and > > port explicitly as the proxy server in the Firefox browser settings. > > > > However when I add 1 line to the /etc/squid/squid.conf: > > > > redirect_program /usr/local/bin/squid_redirect > > or > > redirect_program /usr/local/bin/wrapzap > > > > (both scripts are from http://adzapper.sourceforge.net/ - they are there, > > they are executable, the shebang lines are ok and they are in Unix text format). > > > > then I can't telnet to port 8080 anymore, "netstat -an" shows that no processes > > are listening at that port and in the /var/squid/logs/cache.log I see: > > > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| Starting Squid Cache version 2.5.STABLE12 for > > i386-unknown-openbsd3.8... > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| Process ID 18166 > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| With 1024 file descriptors available > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| Performing DNS Tests... > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| Successful DNS name lookup tests... > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| DNS Socket created at 0.0.0.0, port 7382, FD 4 > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| Adding nameserver 127.0.0.1 from /etc/resolv.conf > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| Adding nameserver 192.168.1.1 from /etc/resolv.conf > > 2005/11/26 16:48:48| helperOpenServers: Starting 5 'squid_redirect' processes > > 2005/11/26 16:48:53| WARNING: Cannot run > > '/usr/local/bin/squid_redirect' process. > > > > But I don't see what is the reason for that failure. How could I debug > > it please? > > > > I looked from the source code of AdZap's squid_redirect, but didn't > > see there any files being created (re some permission problems). > > > > Squid on OpenBSD runs as _squid:_squid: > > > > gate:bin {274} ps uawwwx | grep -i squid > > _squid 22565 9.2 1.5 4124 5932 ?? S 5:09PM 0:00.19 > > (squid) -D (squid) > > root 31118 0.0 0.1 900 576 ?? Ss 5:09PM 0:00.01 squid -D > > _squid 7633 0.0 0.1 152 320 ?? Ss 5:09PM 0:00.07 > > (unlinkd) (unlinkd) > > > > But the dir and file permissions in /var/squid seem to be fine... > > > > I've also run "sudo squid -NX -d 5 | & tee ~/log.txt" and compared > > the outputs with and without redirect_program-line. The latter one stops at: > > > > ... > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| fd_open FD 0 stdin > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| fd_open FD 1 stdout > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| fd_open FD 2 stderr > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| leave_suid: PID 28801 called > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| leave_suid: PID 28801 giving up root, becoming '_squid' > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| Starting Squid Cache version 2.5.STABLE12 for > > i386-unknown-openbsd3.8... > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| Process ID 28801 > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| With 1024 file descriptors available > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| Performing DNS Tests... > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| Successful DNS name lookup tests... > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| DNS Socket created at 0.0.0.0, port 29927, FD 4 > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| Adding nameserver 127.0.0.1 from /etc/resolv.conf > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| Adding nameserver 192.168.1.1 from /etc/resolv.conf > > 2005/11/26 17:11:18| helperOpenServers: Starting 5 'squid_redirect' processes > > > > (the full outputs are attached). How do I get more details there? > > > > Regards > > Alex > > > > > > >
