Hi Henrik, Thanks for the answer. Is it true that once 302 becomes cacheable, the 304 response (if-modified-since >= last-modified) will become cacheable as well? Thanks, --Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:53 AM > To: Chris Fong > Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: 302 response becomes not cacheable with > "if-modified-since" header? > > > > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Chris Fong wrote: > > > I am currently using squid 2.5.STABLE9. I noticed that if > my request > > has the "if-modified-since" header, server's 302 response > becomes no > > longer cacheable. > > There is a lot odd things going on with cacheable 302 > replies, not only > this. 302 is somewhat different from the other response codes > wrt caching > (use of heuristics/refresh_pattern is forbidden by spec). > > I am working on fixing some of this for 2.5.STABLE12. For > details on the > progress monitor Bug #1420. > > Regards > Henrik > >
