On 05.08 11:16, Askar wrote: > I want to configure a cache server which have three parents. Do a child > have more then on parent ? :), what i'm doing atm is something like > this..... > cache_peer parent-cache1 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only > cache_peer parent-cache2 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only > cache_peer parent-cache3 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only why no-query? You should use no-query only for proxies that don't support ICP/HTCP. > However when i check on parent proxy i could see only parent-cache1 got > the request not the others. So what exactly i want to choose parent in > round robin fashion. > > secondly if the child cache request an object from parents it serve it > without caching it local is "no-query proxy-only" is right for that purpose? the proxy-only is OK, but no-query is bad idea. I have 3 parents too: cache_peer proxy1.nextra.sk parent 3128 3130 proxy-only cache_peer proxy2.nextra.sk parent 3128 3130 proxy-only cache_peer proxy3.nextra.sk parent 3128 3130 proxy-only and logs show this: tux squid # grep /proxy1.nextra.sk access.log | wc -l 197122 tux squid # grep /proxy2.nextra.sk access.log | wc -l 188456 tux squid # grep /proxy3.nextra.sk access.log | wc -l 179851 looking at cache_peer docs: # use 'round-robin' to define a set of parents which # should be used in a round-robin fashion in the # absence of any ICP queries. I think that either enabling HTCP/ICP or adding round-robin would help you. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
