What kind of options are used to make ext3 comparable to ext2 in performance for squid. On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:15 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > >However, some researches documented that reiserfs is not good FS for things > > >like squid cache and that ext3 is faster... > > On 27.05 07:51, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > > And several has the exact opposite results.. > > Of course, for example there are people that do not know the 'notail' option > for reisersfs ;) > > I just want to say that some people prefer ext3 over reiserfs. basically, > used options were well-tuned for squid cache directory.
