Search squid archive

Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir
From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 07:51:41 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Squid Users <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mailing list squid-users@squid-cache.org
In-reply-to: <20050526083147.GE7540@fantomas.sk>
Mailing-list: contact squid-users-help@squid-cache.org; run by ezmlm
References: <42948C96.5080401@askarali.info> <20050526083147.GE7540@fantomas.sk>

On Thu, 26 May 2005, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

However, some researches documented that reiserfs is not good FS for things
like squid cache and that ext3 is faster...


And several has the exact opposite results..

Regards
Henrik

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir
  - From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas

References:
- [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir
  - From: Askar Ali
- Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir
  - From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas

Prev by Date: Re: [squid-users] ntlm tutorials
Next by Date: RE: [squid-users] Squid authentication and Active Directory
Previous by thread: Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir
Next by thread: Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Audio Users] [Samba] [Big List of Linux Books] [Linux USB] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux