Search squid archive

Re: [squid-users] tune up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

On 29.05 12:55, Askar wrote:
Hi Henrik

I am not Henrik, but...

Just migrated on of our production cache server to "aufs" but i'm kinda confuse watchen too many squid process running, I read about aufs , that it will start number of process "thread" for disk I/O"
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/squid/chapter/ch08.pdf

Atm there are ....

$ps -ef | grep squid | wc -l
31

squid processes running is this normal ?

yes. aufs causes squid use threads, which looks like more processes on linux
(and possibly other OSes). Nothing bad or ineffective.

But still I have some reservations,... here i'm quating from one of my mate which I just consulted.

"diskd is sysV IPC based and scales based on IPC message passing efficiency, aufs is threads based and scales based on pthread locking efficiency & system scheduling overhad the overhead of both is ~ the same.

and they have been profiled to within an inch of each other in linux, with no /clear/ winner"



regards

Askar Ali


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux