>> I'm using Squid 3 in a chroot environment, I always compile from >> source. I have a Debian Sarge 2.6.11.5 with grsecurity and reiser4 >> patches. And expected a strange behaviour of squid, used as a very >> simple transparent proxy, with almost no acls. Everything is ok, HN> Everything is not OK with Squid-3 development version. At this time there HN> is several known critical bugs, of which at least two causes data HN> corruption. ah.. I've always used Squid 3, never used Squid 2. I started using it when the first PRE2 was out. I think it is much better than the SQUID 2 branch. I have no problems till I did a refresh last night. Can you give me a tip, what to check in the config? Maybe I'm the wrong. 50% is very interrresting (for me, but not for the users) HN> "download managers" generally screw up things worse than anything else HN> seen in the world of HTTP. And this combined with using an unstable HN> development version of Squid may give some unexpected results.. However, IE downloads the files. Only download manager fails. What log you need to trace the problem? -- Thomas Elias Title: System administrator, Programmer mailto: eliast@xxxxxxx Tel.: +3630/3299315 ICQ UIN: 206-714-459 Quote: "A számban a nyál, az ütőeremben a vér! Végzem a dolgomat, Te meg majd eldöntöd, hogy mennyit ér! (TCS)"
