Search squid archive

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.5 vs. Apache 2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.02 08:05, Maya Zimerman wrote:
> I am intereasted to get and opinion/info about a comparison between two 
> proxy caches: Squid and Apache in regards to performance as Web cache, 
> memory requirements, s/w architecture, stability etc.

although apache supports proxying, I don't recommend it. apache is
primarily web server and doesn't have capbilities that squid has, and is
not optimised for performance as squid is.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!".

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux