Re: [Nouveau] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >   Hi,
> >
> > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard.  Patch attached (untested, have no
> > > > test hardware).  But maybe I missed some detail ...
> > >
> > > I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> > > into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary the GEM
> > > object can be initialized in between. I think that's slightly more
> > > flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
> >
> > Yes, that should work too.
> >
> > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks guys, applied to drm-misc-next.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]