> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > > > On 27 Nov 2018, at 15:38, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm not really asking how to use it, but it's very odd to have a patch > > > adding a new dep without seeing any accompanying patches which need that > > > dependency. > > > > You may want to look there: > > https://github.com/c3d/spice/tree/smart-streaming. > > I’m surprised you are not aware of this proposal. > > I'm not saying I'm unable to find any examples of how it's used. By > looking at the patch sent to the mailing list, I have no idea if I > should assume the instrumentation is going to be merged as is, if only a > subset of it is intended to be submitted, if it's going to be modified, > ... So yes I'm aware of your work, but I don't know for sure what's > the plan for upstream. > > Christophe > The plan is the same for downstream, downstream is mostly some former release with some patches on top taken from newer upstream (like CVEs and other important fixes), the only exception, as far as I know, are some customer related not still integrated to upstream that will be merged upstream when ready. Why should be different for this patch? (Probably I didn't understand your concern) Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel