> > So, if I remember correctly, Gerd recommended returning this value from > > the function. But I think it needs more explanation here. What exactly > > is a "monitor_id" supposed to represent? It is not used in your follow- > > up qemu patch so it's hard to tell. > > It's supposed to be the actual monitor_id that we use in SPICE to > identify the monitors. I've just spent quite some time looking up where > the monitor_id actually comes from, and it's actually set all the way > down in the driver (either xf86-video-qxl or the KMS driver in the > kernel) and passed through the monitors_config functions to SPICE > server. How does all this monitors_config work currently in case multiple display channels are present? There is the QXLInterface->client_monitors_config() callback. There is the spice_qxl_monitors_config_async() function. Both are linked to a display channel. The server/client messages go through the main channel though ... So what happens if a message from the client arrives? Is that broadcasted as-is to all display channels? The current qemu code (interface_client_monitors_config in spice-display.c, which is used with virtio-gpu) simply uses the head as index into the array, so it looks like spice-server doesn't do any filtering here (like only filling in the monitors which belong to the display channel). spice_qxl_monitors_config_async() is never called with virtio-gpu, except when opengl is enabled. In that case qemu simply sets QXLMonitorsConfig->count to 1 and fills in QXLMonitorsConfig->head[0] (see qemu_spice_gl_monitor_config in spice-display.c). Which would be ok in case spice-server merges the configs from all channels before sending it off to the client. Not sure this actually happens ... > Interstingly enough, that seems to be the ID we want to have in the > device_display_id attribute. I expect (still need to look that up, I'm > out of time right now) that for virtio-gpu the ID is a bit different, Keep in mind that multiple display devices don't really work right now, and possibly we need to fix not only spice but qemu too. > And yeah, I didn't use the id in the QEMU patches, as I didn't know > how, I expect Gerd to have some grand plans for it :) IIRC the latest plan was to just keep things as is, plan with one channel per monitor for all future things, and just not support one-qxl-device-multihead in combination with multiple display channels. Is that correct? I don't think we need the monitors_id in qemu then, qemu can simply use the channel_id (except for the legacy qxl case). cheers, Gerd _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel