> On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 11:21 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 03:41 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > ping > > > > > > Sorry, I was thinking how to handle this and eventually forgot about > > > it. Two notes: > > > > > > 1. Without really looking into the differences in the protocol, I would > > > expect some part of the spice_codegen.py that was specific to the old > > > protocol should be removed as well? > > > > > > > Yes, sent some follow ups. > > Yeah, noticed those after replying here. > > > > 2. I think this removal of backwards compatibility should be documented > > > somewhere, along with the versions of SPICE server/client with which it > > > breaks compatibility. I also think we should use major versions to make > > > compatibility breakage obvious. > > > > > > > There's the NEWS file which is usually updated before release but it > > won't be a bad idea to update it along the way so to not forget and > > to avoid the people doing the release to parse all the commit log. > > About the major we don't bump much the major... actually is still a 0.XX > > version. > > Yeah, so I suppose I'm proposing to start using the major number for > (at least) this purpose... > > Cheers, > Lukas > As it does not break API/ABI I won't surely bump so version major. So you are proposing to bump the "visible" (from user prospective) major version (the 0.35). As a user I would ask "what's the big leap in this new version after 10 years?". A reply "we removed support for a protocol we superseded 10 years ago" does not sound that exiting. On the other hand we got Linux 4.x because 30 was a too big number so I suppose is just question of opinions. > > > Cheers, > > > Lukas > > > Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel