Re: [spice-server] style: Slight tweak to the header guard section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:55:44AM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> Now, Christophe’s arguments are that
> 
> 1) we should not write guidelines that are inconsistent with existing code.
> 2) this is in the server codebase, so we should server rules
> 
> Problem is with 2, really.
> 
> We started updating the guidelines because we wanted to talk about C++
> style in the streaming agent, not the server.
> I updated the server guidelines, because that’s historically where the
> style guide has been, and the only place where SPICE has one.
> 
> For now, I’d vote for stating that the server guidelines apply to all
> of the SPICE code. If we decide that means we should move them
> elsewhere, that’s fine with me.
> 
> If that idea is accepted, then Christophe (2) no longer hold, and we
> can explicitly state that we accept both // and /* for all comments,
> including that one.

My patch was changing the example from using // to using /*, and was
adding a note explicitly saying // was acceptable too.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]