> > On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:50 +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > > > > Let’s first share our preference on existing styles to see if we agree on > > anything… > > As for me, I have a slight preference for the LLVM coding style, but I made > > modifications in my own clang-format files. > > Ok, so since nobody really expressed an opinion here, I'm inclined to > proceed with my original proposal. Frediano seemed to agree, is it so, > Frediano? > > The LLVM coding style still is an alternative, but I still consider > camel_case_function_names better for consistency with our C code. > > Lukas I would like to see these style in a documentation. I think the quickest way is to integrate these notes in spice-server docs/spice_style.txt and put a simple txt document in spice-streaming-agent to refer to this. This for various reasons: - spice-server already "compile" this document in HTML; - the document is used for https://www.spice-space.org/spice-project-coding-style-and-coding-conventions.html page so you'll have the web page for free; - the style is mainly an extension of the server style, copying all the style to the new repository would be a big effort to maintain in sync (another option would be to put in the new repository only the additions/ exception but this won't solve previous points) Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel