Re: Coding style and naming conventions for C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:50 +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> 
> Let’s first share our preference on existing styles to see if we agree on anything…
> As for me, I have a slight preference for the LLVM coding style, but I made
> modifications in my own clang-format files.

Ok, so since nobody really expressed an opinion here, I'm inclined to
proceed with my original proposal. Frediano seemed to agree, is it so,
Frediano?

The LLVM coding style still is an alternative, but I still consider
camel_case_function_names better for consistency with our C code.

Lukas
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]