From: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/spice-streaming-agent/plugin.hpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/spice-streaming-agent/plugin.hpp
b/include/spice-streaming-agent/plugin.hpp
index 727cb3b..607fabf 100644
--- a/include/spice-streaming-agent/plugin.hpp
+++ b/include/spice-streaming-agent/plugin.hpp
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ class FrameCapture;
* where MM is major and mm is the minor, can be easily expanded
* using more bits in the future
*/
-enum Constants : unsigned { PluginVersion = 0x100u };
+enum Constants : unsigned { PluginVersion = 0x001u };
enum Ranks : unsigned {
/// this plugin should not be used
Nack... ABI not compatible
Precisely. We should not have started at 1.0. I think it’s still time to fix it.
Christophe
Going backward? Would not be easier to get to 1.1 instead?
Also 0x1 does not fit with the comment above.
Yes. I think that what we build presently should be labelled as 0.01, not 1.0.
Unless you consider this ABI / API to be good enough to be labelled 1.0,
which I do not, because it still lacks some very basic amenities.
Now, it’s only an internal number, so I don’t mind much going to 2.0 instead
if you prefer. It cannot be 1.1, because that would be seen as compatible.
But I thought 0.01 was fairer to the actual state of the API, while also
indicating a compatibility break.
For an actual release, we can skip 1.0 if we fear there is any risk because
at some point we used 1.0.