Hey, On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:40:47AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > About g_warning and g_debug I remember there's still a pending discussion > on calling these directly. I would stick to spice_debug/spice_warning until > the discussion is closed. I did not change this in v3 (but there can always be a v4!) as this discussion feels like a step backwards to me. The spice-common patches to integrate spice_debug/spice_warning/... more closely with g_debug/g_warning were done as a first step towards moving away from spice_debug/spice_warning. I'd prefer to keep moving forward with that, and use glib logging here. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel