Re: Getting patchwork to acknowledge acks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:42:39PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> During the discussion on PRs and stuff, several people pointed to
> patchwork.
>
> Does anyone know why this tool does not acknowledge acks? For example
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/27298/ has a "Acked-by:
> Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@xxxxxxxxxx>” in the fifth comment,
> and has been merged as 4cdd6e07d3f7ec07dccfa11c12099cb45ac60d3d. Yet
> it’s still marked as “New” by patchwork.

It parses the acked-by and does +1 per-patch
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/Spice/patches/

That`s the only automated feature that it does, afaik.

> There are a few series marked as “Done”:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/Spice/series/?ordering=-last_updated.
> For example, this one https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/25980/
> was marked as “Done”. It’s recent (June 19). Christophe, did you
> explicitly mark it as “Done”, or is some fuzzy parser in patchwork
> smart enough to parse your "I've now pushed this upstream” comment?
>
> Christophe

It does not check if given patch was pushed, no. :(

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]