On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:21:21PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > > At this point, I would say that any of the 2 approaches are an > > improvement over the current code. I'm also unconvinced that we have to > > have support for tweaks, > > But do you have any good argument for depriving me from having tweaks > if I want them? Would you nack tweaks, and if so, why? I'd most likely NACK something that's command-line based, I've been dubious about the need for runtime tweaks in most of the examples you've presented so far, but maybe there will be some specific tweaks that will be great to have, hard to give definitive comments on something so theoritical :) Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel