Re: [spice-server PATCH 7/8] red-record-qxl: replace continue with empty block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/17/2016 12:52 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:

Spice coding style suggests to use curly braces
for while blocks.

Signed-off-by: Uri Lublin <uril@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 server/red-record-qxl.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/server/red-record-qxl.c b/server/red-record-qxl.c
index 8af2c9c..adc487b 100644
--- a/server/red-record-qxl.c
+++ b/server/red-record-qxl.c
@@ -846,8 +846,8 @@ static void child_output_setup(gpointer user_data)
 {
     int fd = GPOINTER_TO_INT(user_data);

-    while (dup2(fd, STDOUT_FILENO) < 0 && errno == EINTR)
-        continue;
+    while (dup2(fd, STDOUT_FILENO) < 0 && errno == EINTR) {
+    }
     close(fd);

     // make sure file is not closed calling exec()

There is another occurrence in the same file.

Yes, I'll modify both.

It's weird to see a close bracket just before a statement, perhaps a combination
of the two like

    while (dup2(fd, STDOUT_FILENO) < 0 && errno == EINTR) {
        continue;
    }

is more "unexpected" ?

OK, I do not find it weird but I can leave the "continue;" in the block.

Thanks,
    Uri

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]