Hey,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:00:09AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> > index 156b7de..edb90f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c
> > @@ -57,11 +57,18 @@ static void qxl_alloc_client_monitors_config(struct
> > qxl_device *qdev, unsigned c
> > qdev->client_monitors_config->count = count;
> > }
> >
> > +enum MonitorsConfigCopyStatus {
> > + MONITORS_CONFIG_COPIED,
> > + MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED,
> > + MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC,
> > +};
> > +
>
> I don't remember exactly kernel style, a
>
> typedef enum {
> MONITORS_CONFIG_COPIED,
> MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED,
> MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC,
> } MonitorsConfigCopyStatus;
>
> could make following code shorter.
A git grep enum in qxl/ returns a dozen results, none of these using
typedef, I guess I just followed that style.
>
> > static int qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(struct qxl_device
> > *qdev)
>
> why not returning MonitorsConfigCopyStatus ?
No idea ;) I'll change the patch.
>
> > {
> > int i;
> > int num_monitors;
> > uint32_t crc;
> > + bool changed = false;
> >
>
> using a "MonitorsConfigCopyStatus res = MONITORS_CONFIG_UNCHANGED" here
> could make return statement shorter.
>
> > num_monitors = qdev->rom->client_monitors_config.count;
> > crc = crc32(0, (const uint8_t *)&qdev->rom->client_monitors_config,
> > @@ -88,17 +99,42 @@ static int
> > qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(struct qxl_device *qdev)
> > &qdev->rom->client_monitors_config.heads[i];
> > struct qxl_head *client_head =
> > &qdev->client_monitors_config->heads[i];
> > - client_head->x = c_rect->left;
> > - client_head->y = c_rect->top;
> > - client_head->width = c_rect->right - c_rect->left;
> > - client_head->height = c_rect->bottom - c_rect->top;
> > - client_head->surface_id = 0;
> > - client_head->id = i;
> > - client_head->flags = 0;
> > + if (client_head->x != c_rect->left) {
> > + client_head->x = c_rect->left;
> > + changed = true;
> > + }
> > + if (client_head->y != c_rect->top) {
> > + client_head->y = c_rect->top;
> > + changed = true;
> > + }
> > + if (client_head->width != c_rect->right - c_rect->left) {
> > + client_head->width = c_rect->right - c_rect->left;
> > + changed = true;
> > + }
> > + if (client_head->height != c_rect->bottom - c_rect->top) {
> > + client_head->height = c_rect->bottom - c_rect->top;
> > + changed = true;
> > + }
> > + if (client_head->surface_id != 0) {
> > + client_head->surface_id = 0;
> > + changed = true;
> > + }
> > + if (client_head->id != i) {
> > + client_head->id = i;
> > + changed = true;
> > + }
>
> quite similar code... I would write a macro but I'm a too macro fun :)
> Would be something like this
>
> if (client_head->id != i)
> res = MONITORS_CONFIG_COPIED;
> client_head->id = i;
>
> make sense?
I'm not a big macro fan, especially if they have side effects, so I
preferred to keep things explicit, even though I am annoyed by the
repetitive code too /o\
>
> > + if (client_head->flags != 0) {
> > + client_head->flags = 0;
> > + changed = true;
> > + }
>
> why testing flags change if is always 0 ?
Yeah, same for surface_id above actually. Just mechanically changed
everything ;)
>
> Usually I would write something like
>
> for (;;) {
> status = qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(qdev);
> if (status != MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC)
> break;
> qxl_io_log(qdev, "failed crc check for client_monitors_config,"
> " retrying\n");
> }
>
> or
>
> while ((status = qxl_display_copy_rom_client_monitors_config(qdev))
> == MONITORS_CONFIG_BAD_CRC) {
> qxl_io_log(qdev, "failed crc check for client_monitors_config,"
> " retrying\n");
> }
>
> (just style and probably indentation is even wrong)
Same as above, I don't like either, first one obscures the loop exit
condition, and second one makes the assignment/test harder to read.
Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel