> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:43:22AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > I think that my reasoning is more focuses on the "get refcounting for free" > > not being > > a great design so willing to change and I prefer a compile error in the > > future > > instead on the "base type". > > Well, this makes the intent of the code harder to get imo, this falls > apart as soon as an intermediate class is added, ... so I really don't > think explicit mentions of the 'base' field in the code is something we > should encourage. If wrapped in a macro, why not, but this still leaves > the problem that this only work with one level of inheritance. > > Christophe > I prefer having to change the source instead of spending hours digging into core files. If base is removed no warnings are issues and memory corruptions happens. Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel