Hey, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 04:48:39PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote: > Hi all, > > I created a spice group in gitlab [0] mirroring the repository from > freedesktop which should be updated every hour. > > [0] https://gitlab.com/groups/spice > > But I would like to discuss the transition to use gitlab for source code > at some time soon. One of the main reasons is the management for users > and repos being much easier with no need to file a bug and wait some > fdo admin to have time to do it. Yes, this would be really useful, hopefully I'll be able to try new user management on spice-nsis soon :) > As pointed by Daniel [1] while discussing the migration of libosinfo to > gitlab, we would still be under open source infrastructure with good > self-service API for managing the project plus other benefits. Personally, if the infrastructure can be libre, it's better, however easier management (as in "more responsive") of repositories/users is the most important thing :) > [2] https://github.com/SPICE > > The pull requests can be disable int gitlab (while we can't on github) > but I wonder if should do that? Really depends on if we are going to be responsive to these or not. As far as I'm concerned, I usually find reviews through web UI very cumbersome. > > As we are at it, I would suggest to rename: > > * linux/vd_agent to spice-vdagent (currently vdagent on gitlab) > * win32/vd_agent to spice-vdagent-win (currently vdagent-win on gitlab) I think it's also missing the qxl-win (name?) repository. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel