Hi ----- Original Message ----- > Hi all, > > I created a spice group in gitlab [0] mirroring the repository from > freedesktop which should be updated every hour. > > [0] https://gitlab.com/groups/spice > > But I would like to discuss the transition to use gitlab for source code > at some time soon. One of the main reasons is the management for users > and repos being much easier with no need to file a bug and wait some > fdo admin to have time to do it. I was wondering about the motivations. I never thought management of users was a bottleneck. Even if takes a while for fdo admins to react and it can be a bit frustrating, it's a one time thing. It doesn't slow spice dev afaik, any counterexample? What are the other motivations? I don't know the limitations of gitlab, anything to say about it? > As pointed by Daniel [1] while discussing the migration of libosinfo to > gitlab, we would still be under open source infrastructure with good > self-service API for managing the project plus other benefits. > > [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2016-March/msg00000.html > > The idea is keeping freedesktop and github [2] as a mirror of gitlab > repos. I'm not sure about moving from bugzilla to the issues thing but I > guess it might make sense in the future. Again, please list motivations. BZ works pretty well, no? > > [2] https://github.com/SPICE > > The pull requests can be disable int gitlab (while we can't on github) > but I wonder if should do that? Can it be setup to notify of new pull requests on spice-devel ML? > As we are at it, I would suggest to rename: > > * linux/vd_agent to spice-vdagent (currently vdagent on gitlab) > * win32/vd_agent to spice-vdagent-win (currently vdagent-win on gitlab) I think it makes sense to keep all the windows sources under a win32/win directory (win32/spice-vdagent) _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel