Re: [PATCH spice-common] RFC: add back codegen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:50:30PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> codegen generated code depends on spice-common code (marshaller, messages
> >> etc),
> >> it makes more sense to keep the generator along this. Otherwise a newer
> >> protocol
> >> release will fail to build older projects (as is the case today).
> >>
> >> *.proto files are required as well, since it generates code that parent
> >> modules
> >> depend on unconditionnaly.
> >>
> >> RFC because we may want to import history and discuss this with Christophe
> >> who
> >> moved codegen to protocol.
> >>
> >
> > Agreed with the idea. Didn't check a lot the patch.
> >
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christophe, could you look at it? This is breaking builds and
> preventing releases.

Yes, I'm aware of these, I'm trying to finish reviewing the gstreamer
patches first, and will get to this next.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]