> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 08:23:01AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > In this case, this protocol addition is local-only, and has only been > > > tested by few people, which does not make me very comfortable with > > > setting it in stone right now. So I'm asking if we should mark this as > > > > This is fud, like most protocol additions, when it's added, it has been > > tested by very few people. > > To me, the difference is that usually, the protocol additions have been > either minor, or for 'non-core' features. > Here we have a major change in the way display is handled, but still, this > work is only partial, as it's local only for now, so yes my feeling is that > we > should be extra careful with this. > > > > > > experimental somehow (but I don't have great suggestions about the > > > 'how'). > > > > If we had such a process, but I don't think it's necessary to create one > > for these messages. > > Does this mean you are 99.999% sure that in 3 years from now we'll still > be happily using these messages? > > Christophe > http://www.moonbattery.com/crystal_ball_dude_lg.jpg Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
