Hi ----- Original Message ----- > Hey, > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 07:00:45AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > I don't get what you are proposing. > > There are actually 2 .proto file. Version 1 and version 2. Should we add > > a version 3? How to add just another .proto for a single message. > > Seems that there is no infrastructure to do what you are proposing. > > But may be I'm wrong or I didn't get it. > > I don't really have a very good suggestion to make. My concern is that > until now, protocol additions meant that we were committing to support > this more or less forever. But it can be modified with flags. A process for deprecation would be equally necessary to a process for new messages. But only if it's needed. In general, the protocol doesn't evolve quickly enough for that to be necessary, we have been dealing with compatibility without to much burden (who needs the 0.4 spice1.proto these days?). > In this case, this protocol addition is local-only, and has only been > tested by few people, which does not make me very comfortable with > setting it in stone right now. So I'm asking if we should mark this as This is fud, like most protocol additions, when it's added, it has been tested by very few people. > experimental somehow (but I don't have great suggestions about the > 'how'). If we had such a process, but I don't think it's necessary to create one for these messages. _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel