Re: RFC: Time functions in Spice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
> > So I propose to rename these functions to spice_nanosecond_time() and
> > spice_millisecond_time() and to define both in utils.h. Would that be
> > ok?
> 
> Why not use g_get_monotonic_time() everywhere? I don't think spice needs
> nanosecond anyway.

Possibly but that requires a much more careful look at the code and is 
more than I intend to chew. So unless you plan on doing such a change 
shortly I think it makes sense applying a simple rename patch to avoid 
the ambiguity in the meantime.

-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]