Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tests/session: test ipv6 uri and proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:37:48AM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:31:11AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > Ah ok, good that we are seeing the same behaviour :) Fwiw, the warnings
> > are avoided with:
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/session.c b/tests/session.c
> > index 0b57e7e..aecc009 100644
> > --- a/tests/session.c
> > +++ b/tests/session.c
> > @@ -16,19 +16,19 @@ static void test_session_uri(void)
> >      } tests[] = {
> >          /* Arguments with empty value */
> 
> The above argument does not imply that those tests are correct?
> 
> >          { "localhost", "5900", NULL,
> > -          "spice://localhost?port=5900&tls-port=",
> > +          "spice://localhost?port=5900",
> >            "spice://localhost?port=5900&" },
> >          { "localhost", "5910", NULL,
> > -          "spice://localhost?tls-port=&port=5910",
> > +          "spice://localhost?port=5910",
> >            "spice://localhost?port=5910&" },
> >          { "localhost", NULL, "5920",
> > -          "spice://localhost?tls-port=5920&port=",
> > +          "spice://localhost?tls-port=5920",
> >            "spice://localhost?tls-port=5920" },
> >          { "127.0.0.1", NULL, "5930",
> > -          "spice://127.0.0.1?port=&tls-port=5930",
> > +          "spice://127.0.0.1?tls-port=5930",
> >            "spice://127.0.0.1?tls-port=5930" },
> >          { "::1", NULL, "5940",
> > -          "spice://[::1]?port=&tls-port=5940",
> > +          "spice://[::1]?tls-port=5940",
> >            "spice://[::1]?tls-port=5940" },
> >      };
> >
> > I can send that as a proper git patch on top of your changes if you want, or
> > feel free to integrate this in your series.
> >
> > Christophe
> 
> It is common to remote-viewer/spicy attach empty tls argument and IIRC
> that was buggy at some point.

Ah indeed, you added support for this in
2ff11ef4d2e2
If this is something we want to support, should we really output a g_warning() when this
occurs?

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]