Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spiceqxl: Reject invalid boolean values, just like for other options.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:44:51AM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> [...]
> > I think etiher we should merge first patch and discard the second or you should merge
> > the two patches together.
> 
> I think it would be ok to commit them separately as a way to make the 
> policy change more obvious.


Yes, imo it's better this way.

> But the idea is also that you now get to 
> decide whether to comit the second patch right away, announce an 
> upcoming policy change regarding the handling of booleans and comit it 6 
> months or a year from, now, or drop it entirely.
> 
> And if a single patch is the preferred option, then that's available 
> too:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2015-June/020172.html
> 
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion on this so the ball is in your camp.
> 

I've pushed this series now,

Christophe

Attachment: pgpzEJLjUwgUg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]