Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spiceqxl: Reject invalid boolean values, just like for other options.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
[...]
> I think etiher we should merge first patch and discard the second or you should merge
> the two patches together.

I think it would be ok to commit them separately as a way to make the 
policy change more obvious. But the idea is also that you now get to 
decide whether to comit the second patch right away, announce an 
upcoming policy change regarding the handling of booleans and comit it 6 
months or a year from, now, or drop it entirely.

And if a single patch is the preferred option, then that's available 
too:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2015-June/020172.html


I don't have a strong opinion on this so the ball is in your camp.

-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]