Re: [PATCH] replay: compatibility with former version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:18:37PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > GMutex usage in replay.c was not working so replace with plain pthread.
> > Avoid to use typedef twice for the same type.
> 
> Looks like the logs for 2 different commits stuck together in a single
> commit ;)
> 

I can split it.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  server/tests/basic_event_loop.c |  8 ++++----
> >  server/tests/replay.c           | 11 ++++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/server/tests/basic_event_loop.c
> > b/server/tests/basic_event_loop.c
> > index e692f3a..89e05ad 100644
> > --- a/server/tests/basic_event_loop.c
> > +++ b/server/tests/basic_event_loop.c
> > @@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ int debug = 0;
> >  #define NOT_IMPLEMENTED printf("%s not implemented\n", __func__);
> >  
> >  
> > -typedef struct SpiceTimer {
> > +struct SpiceTimer {
> >      SpiceTimerFunc func;
> >      void *opaque;
> >      guint source_id;
> > -} SpiceTimer;
> > +};
> 
> In my opinion, it would be less confusing to give it a different name
> than SpiceTimer since it's already used
> 

I think the intention of the header is to define an abstract structure
that shold be implemented by some code. The server/tests/basic_event_loop.c
implemented it defining the real structure.

The confusion came from the fact that newer compiler seems to ignore the
second type definition (which is identical despite the embedded structure
definition).

Frediano


> >  
> >  static SpiceTimer* timer_add(SpiceTimerFunc func, void *opaque)
> >  {
> > @@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ static void timer_remove(SpiceTimer *timer)
> >      g_free(timer);
> >  }
> >  
> > -typedef struct SpiceWatch {
> > +struct SpiceWatch {
> >      void *opaque;
> >      guint source_id;
> >      GIOChannel *channel;
> >      SpiceWatchFunc func;
> > -} SpiceWatch;
> > +};
> >  
> >  static GIOCondition spice_event_to_condition(int event_mask)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/server/tests/replay.c b/server/tests/replay.c
> > index 01590c0..efa97e9 100644
> > --- a/server/tests/replay.c
> > +++ b/server/tests/replay.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >  #include <sys/wait.h>
> >  #include <fcntl.h>
> >  #include <glib.h>
> > +#include <pthread.h>
> >  
> >  #include <spice/macros.h>
> >  #include "red_replay_qxl.h"
> > @@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ static GMainLoop *loop = NULL;
> >  static GAsyncQueue *aqueue = NULL;
> >  static long total_size;
> >  
> > -static GMutex mutex;
> > +static pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> >  static guint fill_source_id = 0;
> >  
> >  
> > @@ -102,9 +103,9 @@ static gboolean fill_queue_idle(gpointer user_data)
> >  
> >  end:
> >      if (!keep) {
> > -        g_mutex_lock(&mutex);
> > +        pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
> >          fill_source_id = 0;
> > -        g_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> > +        pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> >      }
> >      spice_qxl_wakeup(&display_sin);
> >  
> > @@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ end:
> >  
> >  static void fill_queue(void)
> >  {
> > -    g_mutex_lock(&mutex);
> > +    pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
> >  
> >      if (!started)
> >          goto end;
> > @@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ static void fill_queue(void)
> >      fill_source_id = g_idle_add(fill_queue_idle, NULL);
> >  
> >  end:
> > -    g_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> > +    pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> >  }
> >  
> >  
> > --
> > 2.4.3
> > 
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]