Re: [Xspice PATCH 00/11] Xspice script, compiler warnings and README.xspice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/05/2015 05:30 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey,

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 02:35:00PM +0300, Uri Lublin wrote:
I did not push what I considered controversial:
7  uxa: fix compiler warnings (initialize width, height, [xy]Dst_copy)
8  configure: include assert.h and values.h (fix compiler warning y1)
9  qxl_ring: replace memcpy with a simple copy_to/from_qxl_ring


8: Marc-Andre commented we should not use AH_TOP. Also he suggested fixing
this in upstream uxa.
7: following comment on 8 -- maybe also need to be fixed in upstream uxa.

One of the warnings was avoided through
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=fde8a01
(which was subsequently reworked), a second one with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=edefb64
The last hunk seems to still apply on the intel driver, but there are no
warnings about this in the latest builds.

The reason I was asking is because Patch 7 has been added as a patch in
rawhide for some reason.


I can push 7.
I can also push 9 if there are no objections or opinions about it.

Additionally/Alternatively to 7, we can try to copy over
current upstream uxa as a drop-in, and see how it behaves.
Then fix warnings and send them upstream (or the other way
around).

Thanks,
    Uri.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]