Re: Wiki cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/29/2014 03:30 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
>>> If the idea seems sensible, then I'd propose that we work on the Wiki
>>> until
>>> we feel it stands mostly on it's own, and when we hit that point, we
>>> shift
>>> the main pages to reflect that.
>>
>> The website/wiki content needs some reorganization for sure, and the
>> manual editing of the static website content needs to be improved.
>> The next question is if we want to achieve that with a wiki, or by
>> switching to a different 'CMS'. The wiki has the big advantage of being
>> already there. I think Marc-André favoured http://jekyllrb.com for the
>> static website part.
> 
> Yeah, I worked a bit with Jekyll, and it was nice.  I also find plain
> html + a nice css (e.g. bootstrap) surprisingly pleasant to work with.
> 
> If we do keep a static component, I'd suggest we establish a git tree
> with git hooks that auto update (ala Github sites).  And have patches
> and/or commit access to that tree be welcome.

A git would probably have less spam :) Actually all of the non popular
platforms are probably better (then again, mediawiki had good spam
measures for a long time when Daniel was managing it).

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeremy
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]