all the cases you mentioned have been tested.
spice://[....%eth0]?tls-port=5901 , failed
g_proxy_resolver_lookup_async: assertion uri != NULL failed
在 2014-03-25 19:20:12，"David Jaša" <djasa@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道： >Hi, > >On Út, 2014-03-25 at 09:50 +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:45:54AM +0800, bigclouds wrote: >> > centos6.3 >> > spice-gtk-0.20-11.el6.x86_64 >> > spice-server-0.12.2-1.el6.x86_64 >> > spice-glib-0.20-11.el6.x86_64 >> > virt-viewer-0.5.6-8.el6.x86_64 >> > >> > >> > i think the problem is related to spice-glib, g_network_address_new. maybe glib has some problems. >> > it is ok if it is ::1(local lo ipv6), outside ipv6 and local ipv6 failed. it is weird. >> > >> > thanks >> > >> > (remote-viewer:12972): GSpice-DEBUG: spice-session.c:1813 open host fe80::20c:29ff:fe0a:2351:5901 >> >> remote-viewer seems to think 5901 (port name I guess) is part of the >> IP/host. Have you tried spice://[fe80::20c:29ff:fe0a:2351]:5901 or >> spice://fe80::20c:29ff:fe0a:2351?port=5901 ? > >Note that: > * link-local addresses (fe80::something) need interface designation (scope), e.g. fe80::aabb:ccff:fedd:eeff%eth0 > * remote-viewer sticks to uri scheme so ipv6 address needs to be enclosed in brackets (there was a bug clarifying it) >so the correct url for the example above should be: >spice://[fe80:20c:29ff:fe0a:2351%eth0]:5901/ > >There used to be another bug about scope being stripped from the uris in glib, I'm not sure about its status in .el6 though. > >David > >> >> Christophe >> _______________________________________________ >> Spice-devel mailing list >> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel