On 03/14/2014 06:17 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > If no further comments, can I move ahead adding that new channel? ACK by me. > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:39 PM, David Jaša <djasa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Čt, 2014-02-27 at 18:27 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> There's also the option of using a 'temporary' name (e.g. >>>> DraftWebDAVChannel or something) until we're convinced that it's the >>>> right approach and then rename it to a more official name and advertise >>>> it as stable... >>> >>> >>> Imho, we should prefer versioning over "unstable" APIs when possible. >>> >>> The fact that channel id X will be named DraftWebDAVChannel or >>> WebDAVChannel doesn't change much, but perhaps it makes it clear that >>> it could be removed/replaced later. >>> >>> Tbh, this is all hypothetical, the proposed implementation works well >>> with both Linux and Windows remotes (but more exposure would help >>> finding shortcomings..) >>> >> >> IMO fresh builds in virt-preview repo could bring some extra exposure... >> >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spice-devel mailing list >> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel > > > _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel