Hi On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There's also the option of using a 'temporary' name (e.g. > DraftWebDAVChannel or something) until we're convinced that it's the > right approach and then rename it to a more official name and advertise > it as stable... Imho, we should prefer versioning over "unstable" APIs when possible. The fact that channel id X will be named DraftWebDAVChannel or WebDAVChannel doesn't change much, but perhaps it makes it clear that it could be removed/replaced later. Tbh, this is all hypothetical, the proposed implementation works well with both Linux and Windows remotes (but more exposure would help finding shortcomings..) -- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel