On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Yonit Halperin <yhalperi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I did that at first, but the problem was that there are several places in > the code that assume that (chunk->len % stride) is zero (for example, > encoder_usr_more_lines), and I believe that adding the x-offset to quic is > safer than the alternatives. That code doesn't look unfixable or unsafe, it's worth a try. I would prefer a simpler common API. Adding x offset is quite awkward. -- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel