Sorry, I'll stop replying to each of you mails, because it becomes incoherent and hard to follow. Either try to summarize and wait for reply, or let's discuss it on IRC. ----- Original Message ----- > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > If you really want to send scancode, do it the same way as "Data > > > key_scancode" > > > for arbitrary sequence. > > > > will try. > > > > > Why did you drop the flags in the end? > > > > The information can be generated on the server side, so there is no real > > need > > to send it over the wire. > > Not all the flags you proposed. > > > > > > > Another advantage is that a client could request scancode generation > > > > at server side. > > > > This is useful for the javascript/java client, because they do not > > > > have access to scancodes. > > > > > > > > The server (qemu) can synthesize the scancode from the keysym (code > > > > for that already exists in qemu for vnc). > > > > > > I think I understand what you mean, even though I think it becomes weird > > > server > > > cases... > > > > The point is that we already have the code in qemu, and there is not really > > an other > > solutions for the javascript client (or is there a better way to do it?). > > I don't follow you. > > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel > _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel