Re: [patch 0/2] vdagent KEYVAL extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If you really want to send scancode, do it the same way as "Data key_scancode"
> for arbitrary sequence.

will try.

> Why did you drop the flags in the end?

The information can be generated on the server side, so there is no real need
to send it over the wire.
 
> > Another advantage is that a client could request scancode generation
> > at server side.
> > This is useful for the javascript/java client, because they do not
> > have access to scancodes.
> >
> > The server (qemu) can synthesize the scancode from the keysym (code
> > for that already exists in qemu for vnc).
> 
> I think I understand what you mean, even though I think it becomes weird server
> cases...

The point is that we already have the code in qemu, and there is not really an other
solutions for the javascript client (or is there a better way to do it?).

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]