On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:56:33PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote: > > Hi, > > > > So gcc is not happy with the FORCE_INLINE which translates into > > "__attribute__((always_inline)" > > and requires an additional "inline" ? > > Google led me to this similar commit for DragonFly BSD: > > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2012-10/msg00145.html > > It says: > > > The '__attribute__((always_inline))' does not strictly imply 'inline'. > > Newer versions of gcc detect this misuse and issue the warning. > > Including the missing 'inline' resolves the build warning. > > Looked reasonable to me, hence the patch. I'd expect gcc to inline the function anyway, even without 'inline FORCE_INLINE' Christophe
Attachment:
pgp8WKL5j5TWW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel