Re: [xf86-video-qxl warnings 5/6] Actually request the forcibly inline functions to be inline.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hi,
> 
> So gcc is not happy with the FORCE_INLINE  which translates into  
> "__attribute__((always_inline)"
> and requires an additional "inline" ?

Google led me to this similar commit for DragonFly BSD:

  http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2012-10/msg00145.html

It says:

> The '__attribute__((always_inline))' does not strictly imply 'inline'.
>     Newer versions of gcc detect this misuse and issue the warning.
>     Including the missing 'inline' resolves the build warning.

Looked reasonable to me, hence the patch.

Cheers,

Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]