Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think this should be documented (required LLVM version and > the supported build command), > otherwise people cannot test this patch. Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not sure that there is a super concise way to describe for > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst that sparc currently requires 'CC=clang > LLVM_IAS=0' along with a build of clang from the main branch of > llvm-project to work properly. So about this, as a middle ground, would it be okay if I put ``CC=clang LLVM_IAS=0`` (LLVM >= 20) In the documentation, in a similar manner to the s390x entry? I know that LLVM 20 is still a couple months away but those commits will likely be released with that version, and since it also tells people to not use a version that is too old, I think it should be okay (?)
