On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, at 12:05, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 04:55:36PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:52:35AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> > My build test setup compiles allmodconfig all various architectures
>> > (arm64 m68k powerpc riscv s390 sparc64 x86_64) using make -s. If there
>> > is no warning, the only output is
>> >
>> > kernel: arch/sparc/boot/image is ready
>> > kernel: arch/sparc/boot/zImage is ready
>> >
>> > from the sparc64 build. Copy the incantation from x86 which is silent
>> > when building with make -s and also mentions a version indication.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I hope Arnd or someone else can pick it up as davem is not active on
>> sparc for the time being.
>
> Nobody did pick this up. Would resending make sense?
>
> The patch still applies to today's next.
I've applied it to the asm-generic tree now.
Regarding arch/sparc long-term, I think it would be good
if Andreas Larsson could take over as (co-)maintainer,
as he's currently maintaining out-of-tree support for
leon3/4/5, which
My impression from those patches is that they should
pretty much all just get merged anyway. I would also
suggest raising the minimum SPARC32 level to that of
leon3 (SPARCv8e with CAS), which is what glibc requires
anyway for futex().
Arnd
[1] https://www.gaisler.com/anonftp/linux/linux-2.6/kernel/
