On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 08:11:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 01:27:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 22:14:49 +0200 > > > > > The driver core ignores the return value of struct bus_type::remove() > > > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to > > > make this function return void, let struct vio_driver::remove() return > > > void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes > > > it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and should prevent > > > that future driver authors consider returning an error code. > > > > > > Note there are two nominally different implementations for a vio bus: > > > one in arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c and the other in > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c. This patch only addresses the > > > former. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for your Ack. My expectation was that this patch will go via a > sparc tree. Does your Ack mean that you think it should take a different > path? I'll pick it up, thanks. greg k-h
