Hi Dave, On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 01:27:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 22:14:49 +0200 > > > The driver core ignores the return value of struct bus_type::remove() > > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to > > make this function return void, let struct vio_driver::remove() return > > void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes > > it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and should prevent > > that future driver authors consider returning an error code. > > > > Note there are two nominally different implementations for a vio bus: > > one in arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c and the other in > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c. This patch only addresses the > > former. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for your Ack. My expectation was that this patch will go via a sparc tree. Does your Ack mean that you think it should take a different path? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
