On 08/11/2017 08:39 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 07-08-17 16:38:41, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
A new variant of memblock_virt_alloc_* allocations:
memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw()
- Does not zero the allocated memory
- Does not panic if request cannot be satisfied
OK, this looks good but I would not introduce memblock_virt_alloc_raw
here because we do not have any users. Please move that to "mm: optimize
early system hash allocations" which actually uses the API. It would be
easier to review it that way.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@xxxxxxxxxx>
other than that
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Sure, I could do this, but as I understood from earlier Dave Miller's
comments, we should do one logical change at a time. Hence, introduce
API in one patch use it in another. So, this is how I tried to organize
this patch set. Is this assumption incorrect?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
