> On 26 Oct 2016, at 16:54, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: James Clarke <jrtc27@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:28:05 +0100 > >> Any progress on TLB flushing? > > I was half-way through an implementation when I noticed that > hypervisor TLB flush handler relative branch bug I posted the > fix for last night. Yep, I saw that. Looks like you forgot to update the comment on __hypervisor_flush_tlb_pending; it still says 16 insns rather than 27. > I'll keep plugging away at it today. Great; let me know if you need a guinea pig, as it’s pretty easy for me to reproduce. Thanks, James-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
