From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:36:10 +0100 > 920c3ed74134 ([SPARC64]: Add basic infrastructure for MD add/remove > notification.) has added __GFP_NOFAIL for the allocation request but > it hasn't mentioned why is this strict requirement really needed. > The code was handling an allocation failure and propagated it properly > up the callchain so it is not clear why it is needed. > > Dave has clarified the intention when I tried to remove the flag as not > being necessary: > " > It is a serious failure. > > If we miss an MDESC update due to this allocation failure, the update > is not an event which gets retransmitted so we will lose the updated > machine description forever. > > We really need this allocation to succeed. > " > > So add a comment to clarify the nofail flag and get rid of the failure > check because __GFP_NOFAIL allocation doesn't fail. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
